Personal Statement
نویسنده
چکیده
I graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in 2003 and completed my residency and post-doctoral training at Yale University School of Medicine. In 2004, I was appointed as an assistant professor at Oklahoma State University. In 2007, I was hired as an assistant professor of psychology at the University of North Texas to be a core faculty member for its doctoral program in clinical psychology. This move was important to my research program because it freed me from the many administrative responsibilities I had acquired as Director of the training clinic at Oklahoma State University. Trained in the Boulder model, I highly value the integration of science and practice and strive to integrate these elements into all aspects of my work.
منابع مشابه
Personal Statement
In this personal statement, I give a non-technical description of my research. I only cite my own papers, numbering them as they appear on my CV. This non-technical description mostly discusses my work in symplectic geometry, but also some recent work in string topology. In the separate self-contained research statement, I provide a technical description of the research. In the research stateme...
متن کاملWriting Resources: Personal Statements and Letters of Recommendation
Writing a personal statement, letter of recommendation, or fellowship statement is a reflective process. It requires one to be thoughtful about why one has engaged in professional experiences as well as intentional about what one has learned. In general these documents should discuss how the applicants' pursuit of their goals has informed their career paths and ideally how their goals align wit...
متن کاملHow Physician Assistant Programs Use the CASPA Personal Statement in Their Admissions Process.
PURPOSE This research surveyed physician assistant (PA) program admissions personnel to determine how the Central Application Service for Physician Assistants (CASPA) personal statements are used, what influence the statements had on certain admissions processes, whether there was any concern about authorship of the statements, and how important certain previously identified content themes were...
متن کاملSubjective vs. Objective Evaluation of Ontological Statements with Crowdsourcing
In this paper we propose and test a methodology for evaluation of statements of a multi-viewpoint ontology by crowdsourcing. The task for the workers was to assess each of the given statement as true statements, controversial viewpoint statement or error. Typically, in crowdsourcing experiments the workers are asked for their personal opinions on the given subject. However, in our case their ab...
متن کاملYoung mothers’ experiences of relationship abuse: Personal stories and public narratives
1 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT 3
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009